Comments on: frustration

By: doik

doik — Thu, 26 May 2011 13:43:08 +0000

yarr, everyone knows maths is just cancelling stuff out until you have nothing left. that’s how you know you got the right answer.

By: blodgett

blodgett — Wed, 25 May 2011 13:46:59 +0000

that would make it taylor expansion of zero, thus cumulants don’t exist

actually that makes it much easier, blodgett will just cross out these sections of tutorial

By: doik

doik — Tue, 24 May 2011 19:21:38 +0000

i like that they are “essentially” defined thus.

also, is it worrying that it makes some sense to me? the “fourier transform… about the zero frequency” is a bit funny though as, i think, is just a fancy pants way of saying, integrate from -infinity to +infinity, which is always 1 for a probability density.

By: blodgett

blodgett — Tue, 24 May 2011 09:10:53 +0000

In reply to cakesniffer. oic much better! :)

By: cakesniffer

cakesniffer — Tue, 24 May 2011 06:49:27 +0000

I thought they were a sort of cloud… :-/